Valuations are rising across emerging CPG which forces us to reconsider our frameworks
By Kiva Dickinson, Founder Selva Ventures

Investors are naturally complaining (as we do) but what is happening here?
First off, consumer products seed and series A investors typically use two methods of valuation: A. Multiple of revenue B. “What do you need to believe?” analysis
Multiple of revenue typically means applying acquisition multiples in the category to your current revenue E.g. Hershey is your most likely acquirer and they typically pay 3-5x LTM sales at acquisition so you should raise at 3-5x sales today
Typically the debate then becomes “which revenue #?” LTM? Likely not representative at seed/A - if you’re growing fast enough to attract investment, your sales 11 months ago should be pretty irrelevant to today’s value
Run-rate is likely more relevant (1-3 months) 1 more fair for DTC 3 more fair for wholesale (need to account for lumpiness of sell-in) Beware seasonality... (NOT "ARR" - there is no “recurring revenue” in CPG sales, especially when it’s non-subscription revenue)
If seed/series A multiples are increasing in parallel to acquisition multiples that makes sense If the former is rising faster than the latter we might have a problem (more on this later)
Most investors consider revenue multiples but focus on a “What do you need to believe?” analysis Basically a less lazy version of solving for ownership: Assume exit revenue, exit multiple, dilution and target return and you get the price you can afford to pay
So what are the bad things that could happen if we pay too high a valuation at seed/A? Bad thing 1: post-money trap / down round This happens if there is a disconnect between your stage and the next stage of investor (or the company doesn't perform)
Need to work backward from the next round How many months of runway do you have? What will your sales be then? Who invests in that stage? What method will they use to value you? If you don’t have cushion for a markup of 1.5-2.5x next round then valuation is too high
Bad thing 2: ultimate returns of seed/A investors could be subpar and capital will leave the market That means working backwards from exit. If you’re paying higher multiples going in, you need higher multiples coming out
This dynamic in tech has driven seed/A valuations upward (average exits have gotten bigger) but it’s not the same in CPG Exits haven’t jumped from 3x to 20x sales So does this mean the music is going to stop (with a bunch of down rounds & bankruptcies)?
Fizzle out (with a bunch of subpar returns for investors in what should be successful exits)?

Is there a third option? Might these higher valuations make some sense?
Could be that the probability of success has increased even though the magnitude of success (size/multiple) may be the same Expected value = probability of success x magnitude of success Why is probability increasing?
Consumer wellness is exploding More consumers are adopting healthier lifestyles and buying healthier products to do so — these products are all coming from emerging brands (big CPG can't innovate) More consumers mean more winners
Funding sources are expanding More financial investors embrace the dynamics of the wellness economy > More capital will enter the growth stage > More brands will reach escape velocity This likely won’t mean more winners but will mean fewer zeros
Exit routes are diversifying
No longer need to rely on only big CPG to acquire you
Can sell to private equity (SmartSweets/TPG)
IPO (Oatly/Celsius)
Consumer wellness SPACs (@humankarp / @RohanAOza)

This thread might be cynically interpreted as reckless, bubble-fueling rationalization of overpaying in CPG…maybe FWIW I think raising at too high a valuation at seed/A is a common and silly way to break your company I'm NOT saying "pay whatever price! 💁♂️"
I just think that as investors, the cost of being right about the attractive macro thesis of your sector is that assets won’t be as cheap as they were in the "good ol days" That's happened in CPG so let's get used to it
Founder & Managing Partner of Selva Ventures | Investing in emerging consumer brands | Formerly: @tpg @circleup | Toronto sports fan @mapleleafs @raptors | 🚩:🇨🇦🇺🇸 📍SF, CA






keonhacai5 mình thấy nhiều người nhắc nên tò mò bấm vào xem thử giao diện thế nào. Mình không có thời gian ngồi mò từng mục, chủ yếu lướt qua cách họ sắp xếp thông tin cho dễ nhìn thôi. Ấn tượng đầu là bố cục khá thoáng, các phần nội dung chia theo từng khối rõ ràng nên kéo xuống không bị “ngợp”. Mấy bảng thông tin dạng cột nhìn gọn, chữ không quá rối nên liếc nhanh vẫn nắm được ý chính. Menu cũng đặt chỗ dễ thấy, bấm qua lại giữa các mục khá mượt, không phải tìm vòng vòng. Nói chung kiểu trình bày này hợp với người chỉ muốn xem nhanh, vì các khối nội…
Bài viết dễ hiểu và đúng ý mình cần, cảm ơn bạn đã chia sẻ. Mình đọc bài này do một người bạn gửi, thấy hay nên lưu lại. Mình cũng hay theo dõi thống kê XSMB mỗi ngày nên tự làm một trang gom số liệu cho dễ tra cứu khỏi phải tìm nhiều nơi. Ai quan tâm cập nhật theo ngày thì xem ở đây https://soicauxsmbpro.theblog.me/pages/9916207/page_202608030027
Mình hay xem soi cầu XSMB với soi cầu MB mỗi ngày để kịp cập nhật trước lúc quay số, kiểu để đỡ bị động. Thường mình cũng lướt qua phần dự đoán XSMB, xem thêm thống kê lô gan và lô xiên để tự cân nhắc xem dạo này bộ số nào có dấu hiệu lặp lại. Có hôm anh em trong nhóm còn bàn về mấy công cụ quay thử XSMB, Rồng Bạch Kim, rồi đối chiếu dữ liệu lịch sử cho dễ hình dung tần suất thực tế. Mình thấy dd xsmb chỉ là một phần tham khảo thôi, chứ đoán miền Bắc không thể trông vào hên xui hoàn toàn, vẫn phải ghép thêm cầu bạch…